<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel><title>politech</title>
<description>Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list</description>
<item>
<title>[Politech] Judge rules defendant can't be forced to divulge PGP passphrase [priv]</title>
<link>http://lists.jammed.com/politech/2007/12/0000.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<BR />
I haven't been very prolific with Politech recently, in part because I'm <BR />
  trying to send out only more important items rather than routine news <BR />
stories. This one meets the importance test.<BR />
<BR />
Text of article:<BR />
<a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9834495-38.html">http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9834495-38.html</a><BR />
<BR />
First three grafs:<BR />
<BR />
   A federal judge in Vermont has ruled that prosecutors can't force a<BR />
   criminal defendant accused of having illegal images on his hard drive<BR />
   to divulge his PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) passphrase.<BR />
<BR />
   U.S. Magistrate Judge Jerome Niedermeier ruled that a man charged with<BR />
   transporting child pornography on his laptop across the Canadian<BR />
   border has a Fifth Amendment right not to turn over the<BR />
   passphrase to prosecutors. The Fifth Amendment protects the right<BR />
   to avoid self-incrimination.<BR />
<BR />
   Niedermeier tossed out a grand jury's subpoena that directed Sebastien<BR />
   Boucher to provide &quot;any passwords&quot; used with the Alienware<BR />
   laptop. &quot;Compelling Boucher to enter the password forces him to<BR />
   produce evidence that could be used to incriminate him,&quot; the judge<BR />
   wrote in an order dated November 29 that went unnoticed until this<BR />
   week. &quot;Producing the password, as if it were a key to a locked<BR />
   container, forces Boucher to produce the contents of his laptop.&quot;<BR />
<BR />
Link to court opinion:<BR />
<a href="http://www.volokh.com/files/Boucher.pdf">http://www.volokh.com/files/Boucher.pdf</a><BR />
<BR />
Orin Kerr's this-ruling-is-wrong post:<BR />
<a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1197670606.shtml">http://volokh.com/posts/1197670606.shtml</a><BR />
<BR />
Link to Michael Froomkin's old law review article touching on this:<BR />
<a href="http://osaka.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/seminar/papers/anon/intlaw_paper.html">http://osaka.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/seminar/papers/anon/intlaw_paper.html</a><BR />
<BR />
-Declan<BR />
_______________________________________________<BR />
Politech mailing list<BR />
Archived at <a href="http://www.politechbot.com/">http://www.politechbot.com/</a><BR />
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (<a href="http://www.mccullagh.org/">http://www.mccullagh.org/</a>)<BR />
<BR />
<p><!-- body="end" --><BR />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:42:41 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Declan McCullagh</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Politech] Politicians push for mandatory data retention laws, bipartisanly [priv]</title>
<link>http://lists.jammed.com/politech/2008/04/0000.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<BR />
[Did everyone really think this was over? If nothing else, data <BR />
retention proponents have taken a long-term view; here's something I <BR />
wrote in 2005 about the beginnings of the DR push: <BR />
<a href="http://www.news.com/2100-1028_3-5748649.html">http://www.news.com/2100-1028_3-5748649.html</a> --Declan]<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
<a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9926803-38.html">http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9926803-38.html</a><BR />
<BR />
FBI, politicos renew push for ISP data retention laws<BR />
By Declan McCullagh (declan@private)<BR />
<BR />
WASHINGTON--The FBI and multiple members of Congress said on Wednesday <BR />
that Internet service providers must be legally required to keep records <BR />
of their users' activities for later review by police.<BR />
<BR />
Their suggestions for mandatory data retention revive a push for <BR />
potentially sweeping federal laws--which civil libertarians oppose--that <BR />
flagged last year after the resignation of Attorney General Alberto <BR />
Gonzales, the idea's most prominent proponent.<BR />
<BR />
FBI Director Robert Mueller told a House of Representatives committee <BR />
that Internet service providers should be required to keep records of <BR />
users' activities for two years.<BR />
<BR />
Also lending their support for data retention were Rep. Ric Keller, <BR />
R-Fla., who said that Internet chat rooms were crammed with sexual <BR />
predators, and Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the senior Republican on the <BR />
House Judiciary committee and a previous data retention enthusiast. Rep. <BR />
John Conyers, the senior Democrat and chairman, added that any proposed <BR />
data retention legislation submitted by the FBI &quot;would be most welcome.&quot;<BR />
<BR />
[...remainder snipped...]<BR />
_______________________________________________<BR />
Politech mailing list<BR />
Archived at <a href="http://www.politechbot.com/">http://www.politechbot.com/</a><BR />
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (<a href="http://www.mccullagh.org/">http://www.mccullagh.org/</a>)<BR />
<BR />
<p><!-- body="end" --><BR />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:21:16 -0700</pubDate>
<author>Declan McCullagh</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Politech] ITU botnet paper published in draft form, comments requested [priv]</title>
<link>http://lists.jammed.com/politech/2007/11/0002.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<BR />
-------- Original Message --------<BR />
Subject: ITU botnet mitigation toolkit - draft background paper published<BR />
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:45:16 -0800<BR />
From: suresh@private (Suresh Ramasubramanian)<BR />
To: declan@private<BR />
CC: dave@private<BR />
<BR />
Dave and Declan<BR />
<BR />
The ITU botnet toolkit is an ITU-D effort to bring together different<BR />
groups,<BR />
different sets of best practices and different existing efforts in botnet<BR />
mitigation and general spam / cybersecurity work that focuses on botnet<BR />
mitigation, and create a practical implementation of these focused on<BR />
developing countries.<BR />
<BR />
The toolkit website is at<BR />
<a href="http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/cyb/cybersecurity/projects/botnet.html">http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/cyb/cybersecurity/projects/botnet.html</a><BR />
<BR />
A background paper on the toolkit (still draft) is at<BR />
<a href="http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/cyb/cybersecurity/docs/itu-botnet-mitigation-toolkit-background.pdf">http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/cyb/cybersecurity/docs/itu-botnet-mitigation-toolkit-background.pdf</a><BR />
<BR />
The background paper, once published, will form the basis of at least two<BR />
nationwide pilot projects over 2008, involving local, regional and<BR />
international groups from government, industry, independent researchers,<BR />
NGOs<BR />
etc. The first is going to be in Malaysia in association with the Malaysian<BR />
government, in 1Q2008.<BR />
<BR />
The background paper is structured to provide a short &quot;toolkit&quot; of<BR />
approaches,<BR />
with three large appendices describing policy, technology and social<BR />
initiatives that can be followed. There will, inevitably, be some crossover<BR />
between these three appendices, and again inevitably, people familiar<BR />
with one<BR />
section of the paper may at the most be broadly aware of issues in the other<BR />
sections. That's perfectly fine and the paper was structured keeping<BR />
that fact<BR />
in mind.<BR />
<BR />
I am consulting for ITU on this project over 2008, wrote the background<BR />
paper<BR />
and will be helping to coordinate the implementation of these pilots.<BR />
<BR />
I have sent earlier draft versions of this to quite a few people (among them<BR />
several IP / politech readers) and I guess now, closer to the beginning<BR />
of this<BR />
project, it is time to reach out to a broader audience. Comments,<BR />
suggestions,<BR />
offers to help / participate in this are welcome.<BR />
<BR />
thanks<BR />
suresh<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
_______________________________________________<BR />
Politech mailing list<BR />
Archived at <a href="http://www.politechbot.com/">http://www.politechbot.com/</a><BR />
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (<a href="http://www.mccullagh.org/">http://www.mccullagh.org/</a>)<BR />
<BR />
<p><!-- body="end" --><BR />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 02:17:51 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Declan McCullagh</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Politech] David Burt and his Filtering Facts Web site are back [fs]</title>
<link>http://lists.jammed.com/politech/2007/11/0001.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<BR />
David Burt is a longtime fan (some would say apologist) for filtering <BR />
software. See our discussions from 2001:<BR />
<a href="http://www.politechbot.com/p-01734.html">http://www.politechbot.com/p-01734.html</a><BR />
<a href="http://www.politechbot.com/2006/08/01/david-burt-on/">http://www.politechbot.com/2006/08/01/david-burt-on/</a><BR />
<BR />
-Declan<BR />
<BR />
-------- Original Message --------<BR />
Subject: Filtering Facts is back<BR />
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:25:50 -0800<BR />
From: David Burt &lt;david_burt@private&gt;<BR />
To: declan@private<BR />
<BR />
Filtering Facts is back on the web after a too long absence.  In keeping<BR />
with my long association with filtering software, I have completely<BR />
reconstituted www.filteringfacts.org  as both a deep reference site of all<BR />
things related to filtering software, as well as a daily blog of reporting<BR />
on Internet filtering and Internet safety.  Among the material in the new<BR />
website are:<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
--  Legal page (<a href="http://filteringfacts.org/legal/">http://filteringfacts.org/legal/</a> )<BR />
<BR />
Extensive information on all U.S. legal cases involving filtering (CIPA,<BR />
CDA, COPA, etc.) with hundreds of legal documents, as well as the text and<BR />
interpretation of all US state and federal laws involving filtering.<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
-- Filter Effectiveness Tests page (<BR />
<a href="http://filteringfacts.org/research/filter-tests/">http://filteringfacts.org/research/filter-tests/</a> )<BR />
<BR />
A comprehensive index of nearly 100 individual product tests conducted by<BR />
testing labs, organizations, or affiliated researchers.<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
-- Research and Policy Papers page (<BR />
<a href="http://filteringfacts.org/research/papers/">http://filteringfacts.org/research/papers/</a> )<BR />
<BR />
A comprehensive index of over 100 research, policy, and legal papers on<BR />
filtering software created by government entities, filtering companies,<BR />
advocacy groups, academic publications, and other organizations.<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
-- Filter Reviews page (<a href="http://filteringfacts.org/research/filter-reviews/">http://filteringfacts.org/research/filter-reviews/</a> )<BR />
<BR />
A comprehensive index of published filtering product reviews since 1995,<BR />
including over 200 individual product reviews.<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
-- Filtering page (<a href="http://filteringfacts.org/filtering/">http://filteringfacts.org/filtering/</a> )<BR />
<BR />
Extensive information about filtering companies, past as well as present,<BR />
their products and databases.<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
-- Library Filtering Policies Page (<BR />
<a href="http://filteringfacts.org/policy/library-policies/">http://filteringfacts.org/policy/library-policies/</a> )<BR />
<BR />
Archive of over 100 Internet Acceptable Use Policies from public libraries<BR />
that filter.<BR />
<BR />
----------------------------------<BR />
David Burt, Filtering Facts<BR />
david_burt@private<BR />
<a href="http://www.filteringfacts.org">http://www.filteringfacts.org</a><BR />
_______________________________________________<BR />
Politech mailing list<BR />
Archived at <a href="http://www.politechbot.com/">http://www.politechbot.com/</a><BR />
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (<a href="http://www.mccullagh.org/">http://www.mccullagh.org/</a>)<BR />
<BR />
<p><!-- body="end" --><BR />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 02:15:03 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Declan McCullagh</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Politech] Who'd make the most technology-friendly president? Discuss. [econ]</title>
<link>http://lists.jammed.com/politech/2008/01/0000.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<BR />
The February 5 primaries are just a few days away, so it seems timely to <BR />
send some links around.<BR />
<BR />
First, I'm doing a live chat at News.com about technology, politics, and <BR />
who would make the best president when viewed through that lens. It <BR />
starts at 11am PT/2pm ET today, and here's the link:<BR />
<a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9862081-38.html">http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9862081-38.html</a><BR />
<BR />
Second, we've asked the presidential candidates questions about things <BR />
like the DMCA, Net neutrality, retroactive liability for telcom <BR />
companies, and Real ID. Their responses posted are here:<BR />
<a href="http://www.news.com/2009-1028_3-6221134.html">http://www.news.com/2009-1028_3-6221134.html</a><BR />
<BR />
And here's a kind of offbeat story about a hardy band of Googlers <BR />
(current and former employees) who braved the New Hampshire winter to <BR />
gather there and stump for Ron Paul:<BR />
<a href="http://www.news.com/Googlers-stump-in-N.H.-for-Paul/2100-1028_3-6224935.html">http://www.news.com/Googlers-stump-in-N.H.-for-Paul/2100-1028_3-6224935.html</a><BR />
<BR />
Finally, a link to a tongue-in-cheek survey we did of voters and their <BR />
views on Net Neutrality:<BR />
<a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9843623-7.html">http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9843623-7.html</a><BR />
<BR />
-Declan<BR />
_______________________________________________<BR />
Politech mailing list<BR />
Archived at <a href="http://www.politechbot.com/">http://www.politechbot.com/</a><BR />
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (<a href="http://www.mccullagh.org/">http://www.mccullagh.org/</a>)<BR />
<BR />
<p><!-- body="end" --><BR />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:46:51 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Declan McCullagh</author>
</item>
</channel></rss>
