Re: tmpfile alternative

From: Wichert Akkerman (wichertat_private)
Date: Fri Jan 04 2002 - 03:46:31 PST

Next message: Arturo \: "Re: tmpfile alternative"

Previous message: Giorgio Zoppi: "Re: tmpfile alternative"
In reply to: Christian Recktenwald: "Re: tmpfile alternative"
Next in thread: Tim van Erven: "Re: tmpfile alternative"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Previously Christian Recktenwald wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:22:20PM +0100, zoppiat_private wrote:
> > #define PATH_MAX		1024
> 
> This is system dependend and should be taken from 
> local .h file.

Even better, some systems don't have a limit at all.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /wichertat_private         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichertat_private            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Next message: Arturo \: "Re: tmpfile alternative"
Previous message: Giorgio Zoppi: "Re: tmpfile alternative"
In reply to: Christian Recktenwald: "Re: tmpfile alternative"
Next in thread: Tim van Erven: "Re: tmpfile alternative"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 04 2002 - 10:17:20 PST