Re: slackware permissions

From: Maciek (maciekat_private)
Date: Mon Aug 06 2001 - 11:55:58 PDT

Next message: Tim: "Curious Code Red Behavior with Star Office HTTPd"

Previous message: Reverend Lola: "RE: worm atacking NTs vulnerables detected by NA 2K??"
In reply to: Jakub Jankowski: "Re: slackware permissions"
Next in thread: cdowns: "Re: slackware permissions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I agree on my Slackware with 2.4.5 kernel  /var/log/cron is -rw-rw-rw

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jakub Jankowski" <shastaat_private>
To: <vuln-devat_private>
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: slackware permissions


> On 2001-08-04, kERPLUNK wrote:
> 
> >> Can anyone else confirm or deny that /var/log/cron has perms 666 in
> >> slackware 8.0?
> >
> >my slackware 8, has 644 perms.
> 
>  It depends on the kernel you choose to work with. If you choose 2.4.5
> - both /var/log/cron and /etc/random-seed will be 666'ed because of
> the umask 000 set by that kernel (those files are created upon first
> successful boot, by the system startup scripts). If you choose 2.2.19
> kernel - /var/log/cron and /etc/random-seed have 644 modes.
> 
>  Regards,
>   Jakub
> 
> -- 
> (0>  Jakub Jankowski "Beauty is skin deep;
> //\   shasta@IRCnet   ugly goes right
> V_/_  shastaat_private   to the bone."
> 
>

Next message: Tim: "Curious Code Red Behavior with Star Office HTTPd"
Previous message: Reverend Lola: "RE: worm atacking NTs vulnerables detected by NA 2K??"
In reply to: Jakub Jankowski: "Re: slackware permissions"
Next in thread: cdowns: "Re: slackware permissions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Aug 06 2001 - 12:49:56 PDT