-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonas Thambert [mailto:JonasTat_private] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 1:14 AM > To: 'Conal Darcy'; Russell Handorf > Cc: VULN-DEVat_private; bugtraqat_private > Subject: RE: Wireless Lans give EVERYONE ACCESS > > > WLAN is best used on a separate VLAN/NIC of the firewall in > combination > with VPN into the rest of the internal networks. > > The VPN authentication is best handled my RSA, safeword or biometric > systems. > > Even then its not safe since it only takes 15 min to decrypt the > 40-bits key. Maybe WEP2 128-bits key will solve that :-) 40-bit WEP, 128-bit WEP.. it really doesn't matter that much, since they both still only use 24-bit IVs to set up the RC4.. =( It's really just the illusion of greater cryptographic security with 128-bit WEP... - -- Jon Erickson Cryptologist and Security Designer Caspian 415.974.7081 D49B 4561 1078 0A72 DDF3 7250 8EF4 4681 587E 41DD 1728748 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBO3QX7I70RoFYfkHdEQJlwgCfYW92iJvPULTyB+y9PpFtK8dhdssAoPvT c1SBasuL4kn42S7hLp3bp1S/ =WxQy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 10 2001 - 11:52:23 PDT