Re: CodeGreen beta release (idq-patcher/antiCodeRed/etc.)

From: Blue Boar (BlueBoarat_private)
Date: Wed Sep 05 2001 - 17:55:44 PDT

Next message: .MetsyS.: "Re: CodeGreen beta release (idq-patcher/antiCodeRed/etc.)"

Previous message: Ryan Permeh: "Re: asm shellcode techniques (especially relevant for win32)"
In reply to: Stanley G. Bubrouski: "Re: CodeGreen beta release (idq-patcher/antiCodeRed/etc.)"
Next in thread: Jonathan Rickman: "Re: CodeGreen beta release (idq-patcher/antiCodeRed/etc.)"
Next in thread: .MetsyS.: "Re: CodeGreen beta release (idq-patcher/antiCodeRed/etc.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Stanley G. Bubrouski" wrote:
> 
> Does anyone realize what a bad idea it is to release worms like this in
> the first place, regardless of wheatehr or nto they mean well?

Poor Stan has been dying to play all day.  Since he actually made
some useful arguements, I've allowed his post as counterpoint.

> 
> 8) Go to hell.

Well, useful to a point.

					BB

Next message: .MetsyS.: "Re: CodeGreen beta release (idq-patcher/antiCodeRed/etc.)"
Previous message: Ryan Permeh: "Re: asm shellcode techniques (especially relevant for win32)"
In reply to: Stanley G. Bubrouski: "Re: CodeGreen beta release (idq-patcher/antiCodeRed/etc.)"
Next in thread: Jonathan Rickman: "Re: CodeGreen beta release (idq-patcher/antiCodeRed/etc.)"
Next in thread: .MetsyS.: "Re: CodeGreen beta release (idq-patcher/antiCodeRed/etc.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 05 2001 - 18:14:23 PDT