Re: PGP Signed Messages

From: White Vampire (whitevampireat_private)
Date: Mon Oct 15 2001 - 13:30:11 PDT

  • Next message: Wraith Slayer: "Re: PGP Signed Messages"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 04:27:33PM +0100, [Segmen](dontpanic999at_private) wrote:
    > It occurred to me today what a bad idea the Comment Field is in PGP signed
    > messages. Altering the Comment filed does not affect the validity of the
    > signature, but to the non experienced PGP/GPG user it certainly appears to
    > be part of the message.
    <snip>
    
    	It is a minimal concern.  Ben raised a valid point for those
    using plugins and/or automatic processing.  For those who use plaintext
    e-Mail only, they are frequently intelligent enough to realize the
    horrid syntax issues.
    
    	Regardless, it is fairly evident upon reading.  Those who would
    fall for it would likely not verify the PGP signature in the first
    place, which would leave them in a bad situation regardless.
    
    Regards,
    - -- 
    \   | \  /  White Vampire\Rem                |  http://gammaforce.org/
     \|\|  \/   whitevampireat_private        |  http://gammagear.com/
    "Silly hacker, root is for administrators."  |  http://webfringe.com/
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
    
    iD8DBQE7y0dT3+rxmnEDyl8RAleIAKDHOhG1DkDBwjzcqtQvyFg3qZjdlwCaAqJ+
    SoNXPHSJA1IzLoFFYUY7prg=
    =I0jQ
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 23:28:41 PDT