Aiee :)
Hello!
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 08:38:04AM +0100, Tomas Nybrand IT wrote:
> Well ARP poisoning canīt be considered as something new, and I would
> prefer to call it a vulnerability in the ARP protocol rather than a
> windows vulnerability.
When you set up a static ARP entry, it shouldn't be possible to
overwrite that by getting a new (maybe fake) ARP reply packet.
So, IMHO, this is a WindowsNT/2000 vulnerability about ARP protocol
implementation.
I don't know how to fix that, maybe there're out some new SPs.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Tomas Nybrand - UNIX Administrator
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -- Bene qui latuit, bene vixit. --
bye bye
-- gg sullivan
--
Lorenzo Cavallaro `Gigi Sullivan' <sullivanat_private>
Until I loved, life had no beauty;
I did not know I lived until I had loved. (Theodor Korner)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Nov 24 2001 - 15:19:21 PST