On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Maslyar, George wrote: > It's not wrong in Maryland and Virginia. > We are, unfortunately, UCITA states. > Posting to a website makes a clause enforceable. Cool. Please visit my site; http://totally.righteous.net/tos.html If I sign a contract authorizing you to shoot me, does that free you from criminal prosecution? My point has always been that this is wiretapping and eavesdropping, both of which are illegal under state and federal _Criminal_ law. I don't think a civil agreement supercedes criminal law. Regardless, as i've said repeatedly, I am not interested in debating the legal points in this forum. If some of you feel what Comcast is doing is right or legal, then provide your ad-hoc free legal advice to Comcast. Defending them here serves no useful purpose. If anyone wants to discuss the technical issues involved in avoiding/trashing/owning an Inktomi Traffic Server 4.0 running on linux, then let's rock. The Inktomi Traffic Server is vulnerable on a number of levels, and the neat part is it can be exploited through it's evilest feature. It steals messages that weren't addressed to it, and trusts the content. If I send messages to a server I control, and these messages are stolen by a machine that chokes on them, whose fault is that? Oh, Just because you don't have Comcast cable doesn't mean you have to miss out. These proxies are open from the outside via ports 80 and 554 (rtsp). You can even use them to scan/probe/exploit Comcast's internal RFC-1918 network. Anything named cas??.*.comcast.net is a free open proxy. z
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 12:30:20 PST