Re: SNMP vuln dated in 1997

From: Wes Hardaker (wjhns55at_private)
Date: Wed Feb 20 2002 - 09:28:04 PST

  • Next message: knat_private: "Re: Help needed with bufferoverflow in cvs"

    >>>>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:39:29 +0000, "david evlis reign" <davidreignat_private> said:
    
    david> http://www.phrack.org/show.php?p=50&a=7
    
    david> four years old and you think this is a *new* problem, exploit
    david> code/exploit tools/exploit inormation has been floating around for
    david> years.
    
    Oh please, that's just describing the vulnerabilities everyone knows
    exists with SNMPv1.  Switch a secure version of the protocol (like it
    even suggests in the document) and everything stated there goes away.
    The document describes none of the problems that everyone is talking
    about this month.
    
    -- 
    "Ninjas aren't dangerous.  They're more afraid of you than you are of them."
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Feb 21 2002 - 12:57:50 PST