How large is the binary you have (73501867)? I have two different versions of what appear the be the same exploit, and I have seen others as well (all with the exact same functionality and strings output, yet different sizes). -rw-r--r-- 1 nein users 41948 Feb 28 23:08 73501867.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 nein users 3118 Mar 5 02:06 73501867.strings -rw-r--r-- 1 nein users 33189 Feb 28 23:03 php4x.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 nein users 3118 Feb 28 23:03 php4x.strings I've heard that there are several version floating around to "throw people off", none of which are actually functional. Both of mine are dynamically linked, unstripped. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Erik Tayler erik at digitaloffense dot net On Thursday 28 February 2002 11:03 am, VeNoMouS wrote: > Actally I was pasted on a so called exploit this afternoon which claims to > exploit via post but was only pasted on a binary, > how ever please watch out for this I beleave its a working exploit but it > also seems to open up a udp port on 3049 and some how seems to cloning the > last proc , when stracing the 3049 all it seems to do is sit there and > recv(...) and does nothing when you type anything. > > binary is called 73501867 - x86/linux mod_php v4.0.2rc1-v4.0.5 by lorian. > > Has any one seen this about before?? Is this a trojan , if not then why > does it open udp 3049 even after a reboot. > i trace the proc opening that port kill it and it seems to clone some how > my last proc and then 2mins l8r opens the port again. > > Any ideas? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Olaf Kirch" <okirat_private> > To: "H D Moore" <hdmat_private> > Cc: <fractalgat_private>; <vuln-devat_private> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:07 AM > Subject: Re: Rumours about Apache 1.3.22 exploits > > > > There is a bug in the php_split_mime function in PHP 3.x and 4.x. There > > is a > > > > working exploit floating around which provides a remote bindshell for > > PHP > > > > versions 4.0.1 to 4.0.6 with a handful of default offsets for different > > > platforms. > > > > Blechch. This code is really icky. There's really an sprintf down there > > in the code that looks bad (apart from a few other things that look bad). > > But if I don't misread the patch, the sprintf is still there in 4.1.1. > > > > > Since the PHP developers commited another change to the affected > > > source file (rfc1687.c) about two days ago, speculation is that there > > > is > > yet > > > > another remote exploit. > > > > Not in the public CVS (has been removed?) > > > > Olaf > > -- > > Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we > > play okirat_private | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah > > kin.ir.samse.qurax okirat_private +-------------------- Why Not?! > > ----------------------- UNIX, n.: Spanish manufacturer of fire > > extinguishers.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Mar 05 2002 - 09:56:32 PST