At 10:31 AM 5/1/02 -0700, Blue Boar wrote: >It's a good reason to use cash over the convenience of plastic. That said, AFAIK in event of fraudulent credit card transaction: 1) Without a signature the merchant bears most of the risk. 2) With a fake signature the card issuer (or its insurer) bears most of the risk. Cardholder risk = card cancelled (not always tho!), card issuer gives you a new card. Of course if it happens too many times under _suspicious_ circumstances you may not get a new card. In the country I live, most card cloners do many multiple simultaneous transactions at different places (even states), so it's pretty obvious it's not you. The card issuer gets the bill. Regards, Link.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 01 2002 - 12:34:01 PDT