Re: procmail heap overflow

From: Skot (skotat_private)
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 08:23:51 PDT

Next message: Stefan Esser: "Re: Apache Exploit"

Previous message: Wodahs Latigid: "RE: procmail heap overflow"
Maybe in reply to: flatline: "procmail heap overflow"
Next in thread: Peter Mueller: "RE: procmail heap overflow"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) In-Reply-To: <m3ptynsn51.fsfat_private> >flatline <flatlineat_private> napisał(a): > >> i found a heap overflow in procmail (up until latest) some time ago. > >Actually, the latest version of procmail is 3.22 (2001/09/10), which >is not vulnerable: That seems to differ between BSD and Linux distros too. My Mandrake 7.2 running Procmail v3.14 1999/11/22, doesn't segfault, yet the newer MDK8.2 running procmail v3.22 2001/09/10, does. Go figure. Skot.

Next message: Stefan Esser: "Re: Apache Exploit"
Previous message: Wodahs Latigid: "RE: procmail heap overflow"
Maybe in reply to: flatline: "procmail heap overflow"
Next in thread: Peter Mueller: "RE: procmail heap overflow"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 09:26:50 PDT