Yea, but then it would be a lesser offence no? I'm not to familiar with the DMCA, or law for that matter, but wouldn't a simple name trademark violation be less then a DMCA violation? I don't think it would be to hard to catch people, it just takes a p2p client and a simple search for their titles, then just write down the ip addresses and report them. But I am curious now, would they be able to build a case without validating that the content is actually theirs, not just the name? On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 05:41, vodkaat_private wrote: > Vicne said: > > That could be porn you were hiding from your parents, so you renamed it > > to movies they hate, so they wouldn't look at it. > > If that was the case... > > You're still using their copyrighted movie titles on your porn and > distributing them as property of those movie companies. > > It's kinda like me taking bottles of water and putting "Coca Cola" labels on > them, and giving them out for free. > > I wonder how the MPAA is catching people though. Do they have like p2p > spider bots or something? > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 11 2002 - 11:20:08 PDT