On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 15:38, 3APA3A wrote: > Dear Timo Sirainen, > > You're right, the fact EIP points inside the stack should indicate large > problems. But the string at EIP doesn't look to be shellcode or it's > part. Shellcode could have been before or after it, because of stack base randomization. > How many entries do you have in the log? Just one, which I think means that either the attacker tried not to look suspicious, or just that it was some random bug that triggered the first time. > Do you have stackdump? No, PAX killed it with SIGKILL so I couldn't debug it at all. I'm anyway pretty sure that this wasn't caused at least directly by my code. There's very few buffers in stack, and they're all written to with bounds checking so even corrupted heap shouldn't cause this.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Apr 09 2003 - 08:09:55 PDT