Re: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c

From: master of chaos - lord of mean (losTraceat_private)
Date: Tue May 13 2003 - 16:17:51 PDT

Next message: David Schwartz: "RE: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"

Previous message: Shafik Yaghmour: "RE: Administrivia: List Announcement"
In reply to: David R. Piegdon: "partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Next in thread: David Schwartz: "RE: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Next in thread: Mr. Rufus Faloofus: "Re: Administrivia: List Announcement"
Reply: David Schwartz: "RE: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Reply: andrewgat_private: "Re: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

actually, during debugging i used a modified version with #define SIZE 10.
this one did not produce a SIGSEGV.
when realising that others were able to produce one (Nexus for example), 
i checked the unmodified. it produces a SIGSEGV.

does someone know, why the modified does not produce one?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+wX0jWCFHEwXrEHMRAgx0AJ9o2sXADTflZWLOkDwyUn+FueY3EgCdF5Ck
RnHpQsRiuedObaBlLM50xU0=
=MI0H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Next message: David Schwartz: "RE: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Previous message: Shafik Yaghmour: "RE: Administrivia: List Announcement"
In reply to: David R. Piegdon: "partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Next in thread: David Schwartz: "RE: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Next in thread: Mr. Rufus Faloofus: "Re: Administrivia: List Announcement"
Reply: David Schwartz: "RE: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Reply: andrewgat_private: "Re: partial analysis of vulndev-1.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 13 2003 - 17:09:50 PDT