[Moderator: This piece is amusing because of the scathing words leveled at hackers.] Forwarded From: jonnyx <jonnyxat_private> Nashville Scene - August 27, 1998 "Online" column, by James Hanback, Jr. "Things Better Left Undone" At a hacker convention - yes, they have a convention - a group of hackers released some new hacker software they call "Back Orifice," a pun on Microsoft's BackOffice. The hackers claim that Back Orifice can allow hackers complete, unobstructed access to an individual's desktop and hard drive on any PC running Windows '95 or Windows '98. (They claim to be working on an NT version). For the hackers to get access, a user must unwittingly download Back Orifice from the Internet to their own computer. Microsoft says you'd have to be pretty stupid to download a file from an untrusted source, but I'm sure Back Orifice can find its way around. And now these hackers - who claim to have written Back Orifice for the *good* of the computer industry - have created it, security risks on the Internet are that much greater. Thanks a lot, guys. Hackers claim they write this kind of software to reveal security holes in software so that manufacturers can fix them. Fine, but the group that created Back Orifice also allows it to be downloaded freely from the Internet by any psychotic geek who desires to see what his fatal attraction has stored on her hard drive. Forgive me if I question the hackers' intentions. If they meant well, they wouldn't be demonstrating their software to the world at large. They'd be sharing it with Microsoft, who could then fix the problem. Here's my advice to computer users who fear Back Orifice: Don't download files from sources you don't know or don't trust. And start asking Microsoft for a fix. So far, the company has not released any indication that it plans to secure Windows against Back Orifice. How do we know that hackers have become a danger to society? The White House took special precautions to make sure no one could intercept the closed-circuit broadcast of the president's testimony to Kenneth Starr's grand jury. If the White House is worried about the problem, we'd probably better be worried too. And if you meet a hacker named Sir Dystic (the individual who released Back Orifice, and whose name is an obvious play on "sadistic"), punch him in the nose. Or maybe you can just sue him for invasion of privacy. In fact, "hacker" is too mild a term for people who try to force a corporation's hand by threatening the computing safety of millions of innocent people. By that definition, these people are not hackers; they're cyber-terrorists. -- -o- Subscribe: mail majordomoat_private with "subscribe isn". Today's ISN Sponsor: Repent Security Incorporated [www.repsec.com]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:05:47 PDT