[ISN] Court ruling critical to hacker charges

From: InfoSec News (isnat_private)
Date: Fri Jun 08 2001 - 00:55:46 PDT

  • Next message: InfoSec News: "[ISN] Swordfish & Seizing Electronic Evidence"

    technology writer 
    A court decision that could prove critical to computer hacking cases
    is expected today, when criminal proceedings that began almost three
    years ago near their resolution.
    Auckland man Andrew Garrett stands trial next month on 12 fraud
    charges for the copying of passwords from customers of internet
    service provider Telecom Xtra.
    The Crown alleges that Garrett used a "Trojan horse" program, called
    Back Orifice, to find passwords and other personal details that let
    him use accounts belonging to Xtra customers.
    At this week's pre-trial hearing in the Manukau District Court, Judge
    David Harvey heard final arguments concerning the key issue of whether
    the passwords Mr Garrett is alleged to have stolen could be classed as
    documents under the Crimes Act 1961.
    A ruling on the definition will be handed down by Judge Harvey in
    another hearing scheduled for today, and is likely to take into
    account the failed attempts of convicted "phreaker" Borislav Misic to
    overturn his own conviction, which also rested on the legal definition
    of document.
    In April, Mr Misic lost his Appeal Court case, which sought to
    overturn a two-year-old conviction for fraudulently using a computer
    program to make more than 1400 hours of phone calls worth at least
    Summing up in court yesterday, Judge Harvey compared the use of a
    computer password to the keying in of a credit card number when buying
    goods over the internet from websites like Amazon.com.
    He said the credit card information originated from a document, and
    therefore that information, when stored on a computer, would probably
    constitute a document as well.
    Meanwhile, Mr Garrett's defence counsel is continuing its appeal
    against Judge Harvey's previous ruling, which found that existing
    charges against the accused of wilful damage and threatening to damage
    property could stack up according to the Crimes Act, and computer
    demonstrations may be conducted during the trial for the benefit of a
    The Crimes Amendment Bill No. 6, currently before the law and order
    select committee, is expected to be passed in the next two months,
    adding much-needed clarification to the Crimes Act where cases of
    computer hacking are concerned.
    Mr Garrett's lawyer, Michael Levett, said he had made a submission to
    the Court of Appeal, and would carry through on that if Mr Garrett was
    found guilty.
    "If he is acquitted of the charges, there is no point in the Court of
    Appeal getting involved and reviewing the matter," he said.
    The man at the centre of the drawn-out case just wants the legal
    proceedings to end so that he can get on with his life.
    Mr Garrett said the fact he had been on bail for so long had made it
    nearly impossible for him to secure employment, and the case had taken
    a major toll on his family.
    "This case has been part of our lives for nearly three years. Several
    times I have come very close to shutting up and saying, 'Do what you
    want with me,' but my wife has stood by me all the way and encouraged
    me to fight it."
    Mr Garrett's trial, which begins on July 2 and is expected to run for
    two to three weeks, may include evidence being presented from an
    Australia-based witness via a video link.
    ISN is hosted by SecurityFocus.com
    To unsubscribe email isn-unsubscribeat_private

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jun 08 2001 - 02:57:52 PDT