a) I am not even a part-time NSA employee to the best of my knowledge. b) The machines are Sun servers and it's quite conceivable they have security holes we don't know about which allow access by anyone, NSA and more. There's some concern on the part of the corporate weenies in the world admitting that, but I would be more concerned if I did not. We provide fairly good anonymity with Anonymizer Surfing and also protection against target marketing, cookies, java/javascript access, and routine web site usage monitoring. That's all. Mark Hedges Anonymizer, Inc. On Tue, 30 Dec 1997, David Kennedy wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>Anonymizer could defeat the problem with Internet Explorer, >>provided IE doesn't insist on exchanging version information >>with Redmond. Even so, we'll have Anonymizer Dialup soon in >>several major U.S. cities. > >And we have your word that: > >a) you're not a full time NSA employee. >b) the NSA has not compromised the Anonymizer in some obscure way. > >I don't want to start a flame war. But the truly paranoid must consider >this. > Mixmaster reduces the vulnerability, but even that assumes that multiple >mixmaster sites have not been subverted by <insert the intel agency of your >choice, who was it the Men from U.N.C.L.E were fighting? here>. > >___________________ >Dave Kennedy CISSP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 12:58:52 PDT