[RRE]reading list

From: Phil Agre (pagreat_private)
Date: Fri May 09 2003 - 13:24:54 PDT

  • Next message: Phil Agre: "[RRE]reading list"

    Here are some books that I recommend.
    
    Martin Pawley, Theory and Design in the Second Machine Age, Oxford:
    Blackwell, 1990.  Architects' writing about architecture is very much
    affected by the way that architecture and related institutions are
    organized.  Labor is divided among professions in a way that gives
    architecture an awkwardly small amount to do.  In this context Martin
    Pawley's book is distinctive in that issues of political economy and
    engineering are fully integrated into the story.  His discussions of
    architecture (and some extent other kinds of design) are located in
    both institutional and historical context.  They are also well-written
    and full of interesting detail.
    
    Neil Fligstein, The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology
    of Twenty-First Century Capitalist Societies, Princeton: Princeton
    University Press, 2001.  Proponents of markets usually treat them
    as natural phenomena into which governments intervene, and they treat
    any discussion of government intervention as a foot in the door to
    socialism.  This made some sense in an era when little intellectual
    basis existed for reasoning about the relations between markets
    and government.  In the last decade, however, tremendous advances
    have been made in understanding these relations, particularly by
    means of studying how markets are embedded in their larger social
    context.  This book by Neil Fligstein presents a theory of the ways
    that industries and governments routinely collaborate to establish
    rules that make competition in the industry feasible and routine.
    Everyone involved is very impressed by the hazards of pure price
    competition, and they recognize that the very survival of firms and
    industries depends on shifting competition toward different bases.
    Fligstein presents an extensive conceptual structure for studying
    this process in particular cases, and in doing so he greatly extends
    the already sophisticated project of analyzing firms as part of a
    social structure.
    
    Norman F. Cantor, The Civilization of the Middle Ages, New York:
    Harper Collins, 1993.  This is the finest book I have ever read,
    a tremendously vivid and learned discussion of the growth of
    Western civilization from the dark ages to 1500.  Cantor's method
    is deliberately eclectic.  He does not organize his book around a
    single idea but rather assembles a narrative from a vast number of
    striking insights that could not be summarized.  This is a history
    of civilization in a somewhat old-fashioned sense.  Social history
    is found here and there, but for the most part Cantor's is a story
    of institutions and ideas.  Many of his assertions have a bit of
    a caustic edge, conveying the sense that he is either a world-class
    dinner guest or a total jerk.  But this is a small thing next to
    the sheer intelligence of the book.  Millions of medieval documents
    remain unread, and Cantor's story is certain to undergo revision,
    but for the time being this is just about the finest work of history
    you will ever encounter.
    
    Adrian Johns, The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the
    Making, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.  This is a
    detailed account of the rise of the book trade in early modern
    England.  It is probably not the most theoretically ambitious
    book ever written, but its conceptual structure is capacious enough
    to organize an incredible number of interesting facts and stories
    about people and institutions.  Johns is particularly interesting
    on the architecture of the places in which books were distributed
    and sold, and in which printers and others organized themselves.
    Printers, not authors, are at the center of the story, and Johns
    is especially critical of those who treat printers as a simple
    conduit between authors and readers, or who presuppose a simplistic
    notion of a "copy", whether of a book or anything else.  This
    book will be particularly interesting to those concerned with the
    history and current evolution of copyright, given the central role it
    accords to controversies about copying, and to those concerned with
    the history of ideas, given Johns' dual emphasis on the reciprocal
    influence between the institutions of print and ideas about knowledge
    and the larger world.
    
    James Cornford and Neil Pollack, Putting the University Online:
    Information, Technology and Organizational Change, Buckingham, UK:
    Open University Press, 2003.  This is, to my knowledge, the best book
    on information technology in the university.  It combines case studies
    with a serious and sensible intellectual perspective, and it opens
    up numerous original lines of inquiry on topics such as the role of
    technical standards in the university's evolution as an organization.
    Whereas much work in this area presupposes a shift from the concrete
    to the virtual, Cornford and Pollack present a much more complex and
    realistic story in which notions such as concrete and virtual take on
    a variety of not-always-obvious meanings that interact in complicated
    ways.  I recommend this book to anyone who is concerned with the role
    of information technology in the evolution of any institution, and
    especially of course to those who are concerned with the university
    and its social purposes.
    
    Thomas M. Franck, Fairness in International Law and Institutions,
    Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.  This is one of the most
    excellent books that I have read in years.  Franck is a scholar of
    international law, and his central thesis is that the world's people
    have a growing entitlement to democratic forms of government.  His
    analysis is particularly strong on the ways in which different areas
    of law accrete and become intertwined, so that an entitlement such as
    democratic government can emerge by slow steps and become practically
    irreversible.  His central theme is that of fairness, or equity,
    and he traces the evolution and embedding of particular constructions
    of this theme in various overlapping and interacting areas of law.
    Neither a formalist account of rules nor a wholly contextualized
    social account of their emergence, Francks' book is an argument with
    a single clear architecture that gathers momentum page by page.  It
    is relevant not only to law but to the evolution of all institutions,
    to the extent that institutions are founded on the accretion of rules.
    
    end
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri May 09 2003 - 13:39:11 PDT