Re: NT4-SP3 Sequence Prediction

From: Steve Bellovin (smbat_private)
Date: Wed Sep 09 1998 - 12:27:05 PDT

  • Next message: Jay D. Dyson: "Sun Security Bulletin #00174 (ping) and #00175 (mailtool)"

    Relying on a fast counter for protection is fruitless -- I showed this
    in a 1989 paper.  Look at it this way -- given some idea of the mean
    increment per unit time, trying to find the exact right guess is like
    trying to exploit a race condition.  Usually you lose -- but winning
    just once is enough.
    
    Furthermore, the idea of multiple guesses per attempt appears to be
    sound -- from a quick glance at the TCP spec, an erroneous ACK will not
    cause any harm.
    
    The best solution, of course, is to abandon the fatally-flawed notion
    of address-based authentication in the first place.  If you must use
    it, use a per-connection time base, per RFC 1948.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:15:36 PDT