Re: ICQ99 crash

From: Canu, Stefano (Stefano_Canuat_private)
Date: Fri Feb 19 1999 - 12:47:27 PST

Next message: Eric Stevens: "Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof"

Previous message: David Brumley: "IE0199.exe uninstaller"
Maybe in reply to: loser: "ICQ99 crash"
Next in thread: Ales Mustar: "Re: ICQ99 crash"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In this case, the bug should not be reporrted to Bugtraq at all..
version 99a of ICQ is an internal beta and not been released to the general
public at all..
therefore it should not appear in bugtraq at all..
if the bug pertained to 98a.. which is the public release, then it should
most certainly appear in bugtraq


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	loser [SMTP:flamingdogat_private]
> Sent:	Thursday, February 18, 1999 2:29 PM
> To:	BUGTRAQat_private
> Subject:	Re: ICQ99 crash
>
> This seems to have stirred up a little controversy...I feel I owe an
> explanation. After I received some feedback about the bug, I did
> indeed report it to Mirabilis. This was a week ago and they have yet
> to respond. I was wrong by posting it to Bugtraq first. In the future,
> Ill notify the authors first and THEN if they dont respond, it goes to
> bugtraq.
>
> Now, I would like to stress that the ICQ Web Server has to be running,
> not just any webserver. I think I left out some vital stats in my
> first message. I am using ICQ99a build #1700 on Windows95 4b.
>
> Thanks,
> loser
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Next message: Eric Stevens: "Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof"
Previous message: David Brumley: "IE0199.exe uninstaller"
Maybe in reply to: loser: "ICQ99 crash"
Next in thread: Ales Mustar: "Re: ICQ99 crash"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:36:16 PDT