At 11:51 AM 6/3/99 -0400, der Mouse wrote: > How is it a favor to anyone to allow some illegal names but not >others? It's a first step toward eliminating the root cause of the problem: needlessly inconsistent standards. It's counterintuitive, and inconsistent, that some characters (the underscore in particular) are allowed in user names (that is, to the left of the "@") but not in host names (to the right of the "@"). There's no reason for this inconsistency; it's perfectly reasonable to use the same character set for both. In short, the people who specify host names with underscores aren't "idiots" (as a few people have called them in private e-mails) -- they just have perfectly reasonable expectations. I think that the correct answer is to make the standards consistent with one another. I'd also like to see an option that lets you specify, to BIND, the character set it will accept for host names. This would allow system administrators to let names with underscores pass without throwing the baby (that is, other checks on the name) out with the bath water. This option would be useful until the standards are changed and new software versions become widespread. --Brett Glass
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:48:14 PDT