Re: I found this today and iam reporting it to you first!!! (fwd)

From: Daniel W. Dulitz x108 (dulitzat_private)
Date: Mon Sep 06 1999 - 14:12:31 PDT

  • Next message: FreeBSD -- The Power to Serve: "Re: Local DoS on network by unpriviledged user using setsockopt()"

    [ We're veering into technical mail stuff, so this will be my last
      cc: to Bugtraq. ]
    
    Bret Watson writes:
    > Exactly... however - many mail servers _are_ misconfigured. especially
    > those using an external-internal relay...
    
    Preventing infinite error bouncing is not terribly difficult to begin
    with, and it's no more or less difficult on a boundary relay than it
    is on an ordinary MX relay.  It takes quite a bit of work to
    misconfigure sendmail or qmail so that they will cause mail loops for
    bounce messages.  Remember that the original claim was:
    
    > basically find two sites whose FW is conf'd to accept all mail and forward
    > it to the real mailserver. If this mailserver bounces invalid addresses
    > then you're on your way...
    
    And that's just wrong, as was the original suggestion that the problem
    is caused by delayed error notification.  The problem is caused by a
    difficult-to-accomplish misconfiguration: either (a) the Return-Path
    header was incorrectly set, or (b) the bounce message was sent with a
    non-null envelope address.
    
    Best,
    daniel dulitz
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:01:53 PDT