SSH 1 Why?

From: Daniel P. Zepeda (dpzat_private)
Date: Tue Dec 14 1999 - 19:26:10 PST

Next message: Federico - Comnet S.A.: "Re: Local / Remote D.o.S Attack in War FTP Daemon 1.70"

Previous message: Wakko Ellington Warner-Warner III: "Re: SSH-1.2.27 & RSAREF2 exploit"
Next in thread: Emiliano Kargieman: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Reply: Emiliano Kargieman: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Reply: Emiel Kollof: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Reply: Iván Arce: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Reply: Emil S Hansen: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Reply: R. J. Wysocki: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,
	I've seen a lot of discussion about SSH 1 on this list. I read
somewhere that even the authors of SSH recommended that SSH1 *not* be used
anymore because there were some major holes in it, and that anybody
serious should upgrade to SSH2. What am I missing here? 


 --
Daniel P. Zepeda
dpzat_private

"May the Schwartz be with you." -- Yogurt in Spaceballs. (MMM, yummy!)

Next message: Federico - Comnet S.A.: "Re: Local / Remote D.o.S Attack in War FTP Daemon 1.70"
Previous message: Wakko Ellington Warner-Warner III: "Re: SSH-1.2.27 & RSAREF2 exploit"
Next in thread: Emiliano Kargieman: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Reply: Emiliano Kargieman: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Reply: Emiel Kollof: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Reply: Iván Arce: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Reply: Emil S Hansen: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Reply: R. J. Wysocki: "Re: SSH 1 Why?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:21:07 PDT