Re: Flaw in 3c59x.c or in Kernel?

From: Pug Bainter (pugat_private)
Date: Wed Jan 05 2000 - 12:27:00 PST

  • Next message: gwynpat_private: "Re: L0pht Advisory: RH Linux 6.0/6.1, PAM and userhelper"

    David Malone (dwmaloneat_private) said something that sounded like:
    > > eth1: Too much work in interrupt, status e481. Temporarily disabling
    > > functions(7b7e).
    > We saw this with some Linux machines in college that were connected
    > to busy 100Mb/s ethernet. Bill Paul is right when he says ifconfiging
    > down and then up fixes the hang. To work around the problem we changed
    > max_interrupt_work from 20 to 200 and I don't think they've seen any
    > hangs since. (You can find this in the .c file for the driver).
    
    >From the source code, max_interrupt_work is a insmod-settable variable
    since 3/8/97. I've never tried it admittedly, but will be shortly.
    
    Ciao,
    
    --
    Richard "Pug" Bainter                              |        AMD, Inc.
    Senior System Engineer                             |      Mail Stop 625
     Richard.Bainterat_private  |  pugat_private           |  5900 E. Ben White Blvd
     Phone: (512) 602-0364    |  Fax: (512) 602-6970   |     Austin, TX 78741
    Note: The views may not reflect my employers, or even my own for that matter.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:26:44 PDT