Re: L0pht Advisory: RH Linux 6.0/6.1, PAM and userhelper

• Previous message: Pug Bainter: "Re: Flaw in 3c59x.c or in Kernel?"
• Maybe in reply to: Dildog: "L0pht Advisory: RH Linux 6.0/6.1, PAM and userhelper"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 05-Jan-00 cogNiTioN wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Dildog wrote:
>
>>                        L0pht Security Advisory
>>
>>         Advisory Name: PamSlam
>>     Advisory Released: [01/04/00]
>>           Application: userhelper and PAM on Redhat Linux 6.0/6.1
> [...]
>> Description:
>>
>>      The combination of the fact that both userhelper and PAM follow ..
> [...]
>>    Red Hat Linux 6.0:
> [...]
>>    ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.0/i386/SysVinit-2.77-2.i386.rpm
>
> Sorry if this is my newbie ass showing, but where does the SysVinit
> package fit in? It isn't mentioned in the description, the application:
> filed at the top, or even in RedHat's version of the security release.
> How come?

SysVinit >= 2.74-14 is needed by usermode-1.17-1.

-Philip

• Next message: Kristian Koehntopp: "Re: PHP3 safe_mode and popen()"
• Previous message: Pug Bainter: "Re: Flaw in 3c59x.c or in Kernel?"
• Maybe in reply to: Dildog: "L0pht Advisory: RH Linux 6.0/6.1, PAM and userhelper"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:26:44 PDT