On a (default) installation of BorderManager 3.5 sp1, spc02 running on
NetWare 5.0 sp3a with nici 1.3.1, telnet to port 2000 on the firewall (on
either the public or private interfaces) and hit enter a few times.
Utilization will jump (to 67% on our systems), and the console will
immediately report an error similar to the following:
1-27-2000 9:34:47 am: SERVER-5.0-830 [nmID=2000A]
Short Term Memory Allocator is out of Memory.
1 attempts to get more memory failed.
The telnet session will not disconnect, unless you manually close the
connection. Over the course of two days (every few minutes or so, YMMV) the
error will repeat, with the number of attempts steadily increasing (by
several million each time). Eventually (again, for us it was two days, YMMV)
the firewall will deny all requests, and eventually crash completely.
Further symptoms:
Using tcpcon you can see something listening on port 2000. If the telnet
session has been closed from the remote end, tcpcon reports that the
previous session is in a "closewait" state. It may be possible to do more
bad things since this entry never clears automatically (i.e. use up the rest
of system resources by opening and closing connections to this port). It can
be cleared using tcpcon.
The misbehaving NLM is CSATPXY.NLM. It is the CS Audit Trail Proxy, which is
apparently loaded by default on a BorderManager 3.5 install. From what
various people tell me, it could also be installed on non-BorderManger
Novell servers (though probably not by default) which means this
vulnerability may extend beyond BorderManager 3.5.
Novell was contacted regarding this and the answer was "unload the NLM".
Unloading the NLM does stop the slow death. Rebooting will reload the NLM so
it must be taken out of whatever loads it on boot, of course.
<RANT>
Why is the port even accessable from the outside (or the inside for that
matter)? The default BorderManager packet filtering rules indictate that
pretty much everything is being passed. Why is the NLM loaded by default?
Tcpcon shows various other services running that shouldn't be either
(chargen, echo, etc). Why? What other vulnerabilities am I missing?
</RANT>
enjoy,
ChicknMon
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:33:54 PDT