Upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability

From: Theo de Raadt (deraadtat_private)
Date: Mon Jun 24 2002 - 14:00:10 PDT

  • Next message: Tacettin Karadeniz: "Salescart vuln."

    There is an upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability that we're working on with
    ISS.  Details will be published early next week.
    
    However, I can say that when OpenSSH's sshd(8) is running with priv
    seperation, the bug cannot be exploited.
    
    OpenSSH 3.3p was released a few days ago, with various improvements
    but in particular, it significantly improves the Linux and Solaris
    support for priv sep.  However, it is not yet perfect.  Compression is
    disabled on some systems, and the many varieties of PAM are causing
    major headaches.
    
    However, everyone should update to OpenSSH 3.3 immediately, and enable
    priv seperation in their ssh daemons, by setting this in your
    /etc/ssh/sshd_config file:
    
    	UsePrivilegeSeparation yes
    
    Depending on what your system is, privsep may break some ssh
    functionality.  However, with privsep turned on, you are immune from
    at least one remote hole.  Understand?
    
    3.3 does not contain a fix for this upcoming bug.
    
    If priv seperation does not work on your operating system, you need to
    work with your vendor so that we get patches to make it work on your
    system.  Our developers are swamped enough without trying to support
    the myriad of PAM and other issues which exist in various systems.
    You must call on your vendors to help us.
    
    Basically, OpenSSH sshd(8) is something like 27000 lines of code.  A
    lot of that runs as root.  But when UsePrivilegeSeparation is enabled,
    the daemon splits into two parts.  A part containing about 2500 lines
    of code remains as root, and the rest of the code is shoved into a
    chroot-jail without any privs.  This makes the daemon less vulnerable
    to attack.
    
    We've been trying to warn vendors about 3.3 and the need for privsep,
    but they really have not heeded our call for assistance.  They have
    basically ignored us.  Some, like Alan Cox, even went further stating
    that privsep was not being worked on because "Nobody provided any info
    which proves the problem, and many people dont trust you theo" and
    suggested I "might be feeding everyone a trojan" (I think I'll publish
    that letter -- it is just so funny).  HP's representative was
    downright rude, but that is OK because Compaq is retiring him.  Except
    for Solar Designer, I think none of them has helped the OpenSSH
    portable developers make privsep work better on their systems.
    Apparently Solar Designer is the only person who understands the need
    for this stuff.
    
    So, if vendors would JUMP and get it working better, and send us
    patches IMMEDIATELY, we can perhaps make a 3.3.1p release on Friday
    which supports these systems better.  So send patches by Thursday
    night please.  Then on Tuesday or Wednesday the complete bug report
    with patches (and exploits soon after I am sure) will hit BUGTRAQ.
    
    Let me repeat: even if the bug exists in a privsep'd sshd, it is not
    exploitable.  Clearly we cannot yet publish what the bug is, or
    provide anyone with the real patch, but we can try to get maximum
    deployement of privsep, and therefore make it hurt less when the
    problem is published.
    
    So please push your vendor to get us maximally working privsep patches
    as soon as possible!
    
    We've given most vendors since Friday last week until Thursday to get
    privsep working well for you so that when the announcement comes out
    next week their customers are immunized.  That is nearly a full week
    (but they have already wasted a weekend and a Monday).  Really I think
    this is the best we can hope to do (this thing will eventually leak,
    at which point the details will be published).
    
    Customers can judge their vendors by how they respond to this issue.
    
    OpenBSD and NetBSD users should also update to OpenSSH 3.3 right away.
    On OpenBSD privsep works flawlessly, and I have reports that is also
    true on NetBSD.  All other systems appear to have minor or major
    weaknesses when this code is running.
    
    (securityfocus postmaster; please post this through immediately, since
    i have bcc'd over 30 other places..)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 25 2002 - 22:29:53 PDT