Re: possible open relay hole in qmail-smtpd-auth patch

From: Uwe Ohse (uweat_private)
Date: Thu Jul 17 2003 - 05:12:31 PDT

  • Next message: Siddhartha Jain(IT): "Windows Update - Unsafe ActiveX control"

    On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:48:18PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieksat_private wrote:
     
    > Actually, it is *quite* legal to reply a '250 OK' on something that 
    > will eventually
    
    the patch (qmail-1.03-jms1-antispam.patch) replies with 250, even though 
    it already knows that the message will _not_ reach the recipient and 
    will _not_ be bounced. It knows that the message is being sent to 
    /dev/null.
    
    Sorry for being unclear.
    
    Regards, Uwe
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 17 2003 - 10:18:59 PDT