> Only a fool would blindly depend on someone else's software to gain > anonymity without examining the code. If you need anonymity, then you > should easily be willing to invest sweat equity, or have a contractual > arrangement when the threat is only financial. For more serious > threats requiring anonymity, not reviewing the source when it is > available seems beyond stupid. I'm 100% with you up to now. > I could unserstand your ire if you > were one of our clients, but this was a free service wasn't it? But now you're teetering on insanity. I get a ride home from a pub, but the driver instead of taking me home takes me to a dark alley and beats me to a pulp. My ire at the betrayal of trust should be based upon whether and how much I paid the driver?! If you think purchased business loyalty is more reliable, and provokes a more painful betrayal, than loyalty freely offered out of principled devotion to a common cause, you're not in touch with the same reality I am. This is a case of betrayal among people who thought they were engaged in a common cause of principle. DS _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 21 2003 - 20:37:23 PDT