Do you really feel that a charter and referring off-topic issues that
should go more appropriate forums alone will curtail the amount of
non-essential E-mail communications?
Jeffrey B. Korte,
Information and Physical Security Manager
FirstConsumers National Bank
Voice: 503.520.8398
Fax: 503.520.7941
Pager: 503.921.3105
The information contained in this E-mail message may be privileged,
confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended
recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly
prohibited. If you think you have received this E-mail message in error,
please E-mail the sender at jeffrey_korte@private
Crispin Cowan <crispin@private>
Sent by: To: Jeffrey_Korte/HR/FCNB/Spgla@private
owner-crime@/var/spool/majordomo/l cc: crime@private
ists/crime Subject: Re: CRIME IMPORTANT SECURITY UPDATE INFORMATION
12/11/01 01:32 PM
Jeffrey_Korte/HR/FCNB/Spgla@private wrote:
>As previously recommended, we establish 2 E-mail forums, one dealing
>exclusively with NIPC and other security-related items and the other for
>off line topics.
>
>I don't recall reading an adoption to the resolution nor the person/group
>(ZOT?) to set up the other e-mailer.
>
I do NOT support such a move, at least until we TRY having a charter
that defines what is "off topic", and a nominal spam filter of some kind.
Crispin
--
Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com
Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org
Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun May 26 2002 - 11:37:25 PDT