Re: CRIME DRM Debate Article

From: Mark Morrissey (markem@private)
Date: Wed Apr 17 2002 - 14:26:22 PDT

Next message: Steve Beattie: "Oh, the irony. (Was Re: CRIME NIPC DAILY REPORT: 18 APRIL, 2002)"

Previous message: George Heuston: "CRIME FW: [Ansir] FBI - ANSIR Program - Homeland Security Advisory Syst em"
In reply to: T. Kenji Sugahara: "CRIME DRM Debate Article"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, T. Kenji Sugahara wrote:

> More on the Digital Rights Management debate
> 
> http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/04/17/020417hndrm.xml
> ----
> Law experts leery of DRM solution
> By Scarlet Pruitt
> April 17, 2002 7:13 am PT
> 
> SAN FRANCISCO -- Even a conference room chock full of copyright law 
> experts and technologists could not determine Tuesday what role digital 
> rights management (DRM) should play in balancing the rights of users and 
> content providers...

This will partially be resolved by the myriad of patent lawsuits presently
working through the judicial system. InterTrust will be a player in the
final solution, IMO.

--mark

Next message: Steve Beattie: "Oh, the irony. (Was Re: CRIME NIPC DAILY REPORT: 18 APRIL, 2002)"
Previous message: George Heuston: "CRIME FW: [Ansir] FBI - ANSIR Program - Homeland Security Advisory Syst em"
In reply to: T. Kenji Sugahara: "CRIME DRM Debate Article"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun May 26 2002 - 11:40:55 PDT