I have just send an email to my mailing list regarding this issue. Enjoy. WEN Wanja Eric Naef Webmaster & Principal Researcher IWS - The Information Warfare Site http://www.iwar.org.uk -----Original Message----- From: infocon@g2-forward.org [mailto:infocon@g2-forward.org]On Behalf Of Wanja Eric Naef [IWS] Sent: 07 June 2002 18:50 To: Infocon Subject: [INFOCON] - The Terror Alert They Won't Issue [WEN: Rick's nice commentary about the current hype of issuing public terror warnings which most of us get on a daily basis. I guess the US is in the same state as me about six years ago when I moved to London. One day there was a 'security alert' in the underground station, so I kind of felt weird. Nowadays, I am used to it and consider it just part of every day life. The US will have to get used to what we Europeans have been experiencing over many years. To finish off I want to quote Randall Larsen from Anser ( a great Homeland Defense think tank http://www.anser.org) which should make everyone think twice before spending astronomic amounts of money to prevent terrorism on every street corner in America: The number one threat to American national security during this long war is neither anthrax nor truck bombs … it is uncontrolled spending. We cannot afford to put guards on every bridge and at every critical node of our infrastructure. We cannot afford a sophisticated chemical and biodetector in every government building. America cannot afford a risk-free society in a world of global terrorism. The enemy’s strategy is to destroy our economy. We must not facilitate their efforts. America will need to spend considerable sums of money to ensure our security … but we must do it wisely … there will be no money to waste on irrational fear and unconscionable pork. We must develop a strategic plan to guide our efforts. This must include federal, state and local governments, plus the private sector. Since 9-11, more than 130 bills regarding homeland security have been introduced in the House of Representatives. This is not the example of spending based on a strategic plan. “The outcome of this war will determine the type of nation our grandchild will know. I do not want that to be a nation that is bankrupt.” Randall Larsen, Director, ANSER Institute for Homeland Security, at the National Defense University Symposium on Quadrennial Defense Review 2001 ***************************************************** The Terror Alert They Won't Issue Richard Forno http://www.infowarrior.org/articles/2002-07.html Article #2002-07 (c) 2002 Richard Forno. Permission to reproduce in entirety granted with author credit. Reader Feedback Let's face it - America is a confused nation. Granted, we've always been confused about some things - the metric system, for instance - but in recent days, nearly everyone is befuddled with how to continue living their daily lives in the Age of Terror in America. Since September 11, 2001, the repeated message of the federal government to the American citizens is to 'continue living your lives normally' while continuing to 'be on alert' for anything 'out of the ordinary' that might indicate a potential terrorist act in the making. While this sounds meaningful and a necessary part of the post-0911 America, let's be totally honest with ourselves: it's rather hard to live a normal life when we're constantly-inundated with vaguely-worded predictions of doom and gloom. We know we've been attacked, and we know that there's a chance of future successful attacks in our country, despite the best efforts of the government to protect us. It's a fact of life that we have been forced to accept, whether we like it or not. Americans are a hardy bunch - maybe we're a bit confused at times, but we're not dummies, either. Our government is good, but it's not omnipotent. Talk about a mixed message that creates a national psychosis! From shopping malls to the Statue of Liberty, anything - and anyone - is now a potential target. It's about time we admitted it to ourselves. That being said, let's reflect on what America was warned about 'might happen soon' over this past week: May 20: Defense Secretary Rumsfeld tells Senators that terrorists will eventually obtain weapons of mass destruction. May 20: FBI Director Mueller says that Palestinian-style suicide bombings on US soil is "inevitable." May 21: NIPC reports 'possible terrorist threat' to US Oil Facilities. May 21: President Bush echoes Rumsfeld's warning about terrorists obtaining weapons of mass destruction. May 21: The FBI warns of potential attacks against major landmarks in the US, particularly in New York City. May 21: The FBI circulates warning to apartment and condominium owners of possible terrorist activity in their buildings. May 22: US Government warns its citizens in the Arab world against possible terror attacks. May 24: US Transportation Department issues warning over possible terror attacks on transit, rail, and subway systems. May 24: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission warns 103 US nuclear plants of 'possible terrorist attacks' (by small planes) and to 'be alert'. May 24: The FBI warns that terrorists may develop an "offensive scuba diver capability" to conduct attacks. That last alert was a great way to head into happy hour before a long holiday weekend, especially in Washington, DC. Several people I spoke with shook their heads in disbelief over the actual possibility of 'terrorist scuba divers' -- and wondered why the public needed to know about this potential threat since the NIPC alert stated that "while there is no evidence of operational planning to utilize scuba divers to carry out attacks within the United States, there is a body of information showing the desire to obtain such capability [to attack the United States.]" Sure, terrorists may employ scuba divers, but they could also employ parachutists, school teachers, bus drivers, or hunting-school owners. Should these also generate potential terror alerts? If anything, the events of September 11 should be interpreted as a significant and already-demonstrated desire and capability by certain fundamentalist entities to attack the United States using whatever means available to them to attack large numbers of people and prominent landmarks. That means just what it says - and could include crop dusters, kamikaze pilots, hot air balloons, trains, trucks, and the oft-mentioned capabilities of weapons of mass destruction, among an endless number of other ways to inflict death and destruction on their target. It probably includes offensive scuba divers, too. I'm curious - what exactly is an 'offensive scuba diver'? A diver that refuses to bathe regularly? Perhaps one who swims underwater in a soiled wetsuit? In the eyes of a terrorist or unconventional fighter, anything is a potential avenue or method of attack. In military circles, that's known as asymmetric warfare. But given the established reality that America's terrorist adversaries will use whatever means necessary to achieve their goals, is it really necessary to warn us about each and every one of them? The very nature of terrorism means the target (in this case, the United States) can't defend against all potential avenues of attack; so why must we be inundated with nebulous, vaguely-worded alerts based on slim evidence? Doing so - however well-intentioned - only serves to frighten the average American citizen and make them perpetually uneasy - not a very helpful situation when they're trying to recover and move on with their personal and family lives in the aftermath of September 11 as previously-instructed by the government. Further, such releases should not be used to increase Presidential opinion poll figures or divert attention from (or over-compensate for) decades-old problems with our intelligence and federal law enforcement agencies and processes. Therefore, as a public service to the American people, I offer this Standard Terror Warning (TM) -- a simple thing intended to clarify the reality of America's Homeland Security alert status and make it easier for us to move ahead with our lives in the post-0911 reality: *** Standard Terror Warning *** Based on past actions, it is quite likely that terrorists again will attack the United States in the future. However, we are unsure when, where, or how this may occur, given the unconventional nature of terrorism and the nearly-countless ways in which such entities may conduct their attacks. It should be noted that America is not alone in this unfortunate situation - nations such as the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and others - continue to maintain productive and relatively-peaceful societies over several decades despite similar conditions. Given this new reality - that America is no longer immune from terror acts waged against it from within its borders - citizens and authorized foreign visitors to the United States are advised that they can either spend their lives cowering in fear and hiding in their basements, or continue to move about America and live their lives as best as they can, understanding that America - despite all it offers - has changed slightly for the worse, whether they like it or not. *** Standard Terror Warning *** The public is better-served by a simple official acknowledgement of this New American Reality - despite all the Homeland Security laws, federalized jobs, runaway funding, and media spin, the United States will continue to be an enticing target for its enemies, and there is an unfortunate and tragic likelihood of future attacks on our soil by a variety of means and methods. The hard reality is that America has been forever changed; but nobody in charge wants to come out and admit it publicly. Tiptoeing around the reality of our situation and bombarding the public with vague warnings of little real value doesn't help the American war effort, raise morale, or reassure our citizens. Rather, such alerts perpetuate the lasting negative effects the terrorists have on our people, forcing us to look over our shoulders and shiver in fear every time a new alert is issued, thus creating a culture of national paranoia and confusion, which is what the terrorists wanted anyway -- assuming we can keep up with the barrage of issued alerts, that is. After all, isn't that why it's called 'terrorism' in the first place? It's time to come clean and accept our current reality. Americans, for all our quirks, can understand the truth. We may not like it, but we can accept it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Suggested Reading May 20, 2002 - Associated Press article "Public Can Expect More Terror Warnings" May 22, 2002 - New York Times foreign affairs columnist Tom Friedman's article "Cool It!" May 25, 2002 - CNN.COM article "Terror Alerts on Small Planes, Scuba Divers" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- (c) 2002 Richard Forno. Permission to reproduce in entirety granted with author credit. IWS INFOCON Mailing List @ IWS - The Information Warfare Site http://www.iwar.org.uk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 11:49:26 PDT