Hello All, I have taken the information you provided here to see what we could do with this. In addition to working for SAGE, Inc., I am also the State Representative for House District 26, which is the Wilsonville Sherwood area. I have saved your comments to see about drafting legislation along some of the lines you have suggested. A standing search warrant type of approach probably would be unconstitutional. I would always appreciate any suggestions I do appreciate the input, although it is off normal content for the CRIME group. Jerry Jerry Krummel Senior Account Executive SAGE, Inc. Western Region 30339 SW Thomas St., #803 Wilsonville, OR 97070 Tel: 503-682-3995; Cell: 503-936-6987 Email: jerry@sage-inc.com www.sage-inc.com www.thirdpig.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-crime@private [mailto:owner-crime@private]On Behalf Of Tao, Greg Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:32 PM To: 'crime@private' Subject: CRIME idea to help police respond to life-threatening abductions more effectively Hello, This is only partially off-topic. While it is not a computer-related matter, our group has a lot of law enforcement and criminal prosecution experience, so I figure this is about as good a place as any to float this idea. Let me know what you think of it... MOTIVATION Maybe some good can come out of the deaths of Ashley Pond and Miranda Gaddis, the 2 Oregon City girls whose bodies have been found on the property previously occupied by Ward Weaver. I have long believed that too often our laws or the courts' interpretation of the laws does not allow for common sense measures that could increase public safety while not infringing on our Constitutional rights. PROBLEM STATEMENT When responding to abductions/disappearances, law enforcement is hindered by the stringent requirements for getting search warrants. Today, law enforcement needs to convince a judge that probable cause for search exists. It's something along the lines that you have to explain why you think the person who is the target of the warrant is somehow involved, what you are going to search, and what you expect to find. PROPOSAL Change the law to allow quicker and more flexible searches of people and property in cases where a person's life may be at risk (e.g. abduction or disappearance of a child). This change in the law would in effect create a standing search warrant to look for a missing person at any location of interest to law enforcement. Law enforcement would be authorized to search any part of the property where a human body could be hidden (e.g. crawl space), using reasonable search tools and methods (e.g. dogs trained to locate human beings or bodies based on a scent provided to them prior to the commencement of the search). In the case of e-mail, law enforcement would be authorized to request from the victim's ISP access to email and relevant logs going back as far as needed for the purpose of aiding in the identification of potential persons of interest and material witnesses. WOULD A CHANGE IN THE LAW LIKE THIS HAVE SAVED LIVES IN THE OREGON CITY CASE? Who knows. Hindsight is 20/20, but the proposed change would have provided the opportunity to search the residences and vehicles of all persons with whom Ashley Pond was known to associate. Crimes of this nature have been shown time and time again to involve persons known to the victim, usually within close proximity. It is possible that early action might have prevented her murder, or resulted in the apprehension of the perpetrator shortly after the fact, thus preventing the murder of Miranda Gaddis. This is all speculation, but it is based on common sense. RATIONALE FOR THE PROPOSAL - WHY THE BENEFITS OUTWEIGH THE COSTS This proposal is based on common sense. If a house is burning down, firemen don't ask permission to enter and save lives. They just enter and save lives, cutting through walls if necessary. If we as a society want to get serious about protecting our children and getting criminals off the street, we need to get past the over-simplification of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution. We don't, after all, consider firemen in violation of civil rights when they rush into a burning building to save lives. Likewise, law enforcement must be liberated to be able to conduct reasonable searches of places of interest in a timely manner when life is on the line and minutes count. While there are usually no raging fires in cases of abductions, there is always a group of individuals that the victim knew, some of which may be of more interest than others due to things like past accusations of inappropriate sexual contact. Though personal associations are more subtle than a burning building, they are nevertheless most always connected to abductions that result in murder. I welcome your feedback, including any tips about how to get this idea refined and submitted for consideration by the US Justice Department, the Oregon State Legislature, or the Oregon voters. Thanks, Greg Tao greg.tao@private Disclaimer: These are my personal views and opinions, not the views and opinions of my employer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Aug 27 2002 - 14:39:07 PDT