RE: CRIME Checkpoint versus Sonicwall

From: brvarin@private
Date: Wed Aug 28 2002 - 15:34:05 PDT

  • Next message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: CRIME Checkpoint versus Sonicwall"

    Snort has the option to do Active Response if that's what you mean by
    integrated response. When you compile the initial package, include the
    --enable-flexresp and it will have the ability. You also have to tell each
    signature what to do.
    
    Plug the "resp: xxxxx" into the signature and it'll respond in a variety of
    ways.
    
    
    
    
    
    This is actually one of my bigger complaints with Snort. As  capable as it
    is, it has no integrated response capabilities other than to shoot  off
    alerts. You'd have to custom build a response mechanism for it,
    which isn't easy.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Aug 28 2002 - 16:16:40 PDT