CRIME [Fwd: [Information_technology] Daily News 12/26/02]

From: Lyle Leavitt (lylel@private)
Date: Thu Dec 26 2002 - 09:45:57 PST

  • Next message: George Heuston: "CRIME FW: [Cyber_threats] Daily News 12/26/02"

    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: [Information_technology] Daily News 12/26/02
    Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:30:15 -0800
    From: "NIPC Watch" <nipc.watch@private>
    To: <information_technology@private>
    
    December 23, NewsFactor Network - The code that cuts both ways - the debate
    over full disclosure.
    The focus on computer security has never been more intense, and the debate
    over disclosure has never been hotter. On one hand, mailing lists like
    BugTraq can give vendors an incentive to fix security holes by making them
    public. But some vendors say full disclosure only helps crackers, so they
    urge security experts to wait before making information available. Should
    security experts publicize vulnerability information, especially when
    releasing that data could result in functional attacks on security holes
    before a patch is released? Cate Quirk, an analyst with AMR Research, told
    NewsFactor that lists like BugTraq are necessary. "It certainly gets people
    on the ball, that they do need to patch security holes," she said. But
    despite widespread agreement that public disclosure of security flaws is
    necessary, experts differ on how much information should be made available,
    or how quickly that information should be released. Many people who discover
    security holes are "white hats" -- hackers who want to find vulnerabilities
    and have them fixed before would-be attackers can exploit them to the
    detriment of computer users. But white hats face several practical and
    ethical issues in disclosing security problems. On the other hand, if a
    white hat chooses to remain silent, the vulnerability in question may go
    unreported and unrepaired -- but crackers may also discover it independently
    and exploit it in secret.
    Source: http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/20319.html
    
    
    December 23, Wired News - IDC says that tech bucks and hack threats are up.
    In a series of predictions for the coming year, IDC analysts said the
    economy could expect a boost from an increase in corporate IT spending.
    Every year, IDC makes 10 predictions for the upcoming year. In the six years
    it has made such forecasts, it has usually gotten seven out of 10
    predictions right, says IDC chief research officer John Gantz. IDC fears
    that a war with Iraq will galvanize hackers to use their skills, perhaps in
    a coordinated way, to create "economic disruptions" through
    denial-of-service attacks and even physical attacks on key networks. IDC
    went as far as to say that such an attack would bring the Internet "down to
    its knees" for a day or two. IDC based this prediction on an Oct. 22 DoS
    attack against 13 "root servers" that provide the primary roadmap for almost
    all Internet communications. Although investigators considered it the
    largest and most sophisticated attack ever against the Internet, users
    worldwide were largely unaffected. Still, IDC considered the attack a
    "blueprint" for events to come.
    Source: http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,56902,00.html
    
    _______________________________________________
    Information_technology mailing list
    Information_technology@listserv
    http://listserv.infragard.org/mailman/listinfo/information_technology
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 26 2002 - 16:47:17 PST