RE: CRIME GNU Help

From: Robert Johnston (bob@private)
Date: Thu Jul 17 2003 - 05:54:31 PDT

  • Next message: George Heuston: "CRIME FW: [Information_technology] Daily News 7/17/03"

    I do this for a living.  We see what e can do locally (read cheap and fast).  If
    we can't recover any data, we send it off to Drive Savers. (read expensive and
    slow, but effective).  You are welcome to give me a call.
    
    503-356-9101
    
    
    *****
    
    Robert Johnston
    Datajockeys, LLC 
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-crime@private [mailto:owner-crime@private] On Behalf Of System
    Administrators
    Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:00 AM
    To: Kuo, Jimmy
    Cc: 'crime@private '
    Subject: Re: CRIME GNU Help
    
    
    
    
    Anyone know of any good software to recover data off a drive. Our main
    accounting server (all company info)  died, the man responsible for backing it
    up 
    said he was, but latest backup is 6mo. ago...
    
    Need help here Smart Guys.
    Please reply to steven@private
    
    
    Thanks
    
    
    Steve Nichols
    1-800-909-9078
    503-424-5000 (pdx)
    503-565-5000 (McM)
    
    
    
    On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:09:41PM -0700, Kuo, Jimmy wrote:
    > >>The circumstance where Open Source is good at providing "patches"
    > >>quicker than the proprietary arena involves the "emergency" scenarios.  
    > >>And though this is true even for security products, what the 
    > >>"companies" are good at are the regular, mundane updates.  That's the 
    > >>service aspect that you can't buy with Open Source, and that's what's 
    > >>more true in our ("Security") area of expertise.
    > 
    > >It's not free, but you can buy service for open source products. Many
    > >companies will sell you service for mundane tasks for open source 
    > >systems. The above is just false.
    > 
    > You're right.  What I was referring to is the concept that Open Source 
    > is cheaper because it's Open Source.  And you're making the point I 
    > intended.  That being, service is a separate issue that you would 
    > still need to pay for.
    > 
    > Jimmy
    
    
    
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 17 2003 - 06:41:22 PDT