On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Zot O'Connor wrote: > Not having read the paper in detail. Did they mention as part of the > monoculture the Intel chipset? Having very different processors could > also mitigate this. Or perhaps even just having Linux and MS make the stack non-executable. Is anyone here aware of valid reasons why linux, MS, et al. need an executable stack? --mark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Oct 07 2003 - 12:08:57 PDT