On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 18:45, Shaun Savage wrote: > This gives me a great new angle. > "Why does Law enforcement not like freedom of the press?" or "What do > they have to hide" or "Secrets the government wants to keep from you > about your privacy" > Freedom of speech is just that, freedom. Just because you want to rebroadcast that speech in whole new venue, for a whole new audience does not give you that right. This year Justice Scalia was awarded the Freedom of speech award. People were shocked that he refused to allow them to record his speech. Those people do not understand the personal right to freedom, they wanted to confuse it with the personal desire to use your speech in any way they wanted. Justice Scalia has a Freedom of Speech, and what to do with that speech. In this case there are a number of issues and reasons not to tape and rebroadcast. Not the least of which is honest communication. Public servants, especially those who represent views of legal institutions, are required to present the opinion of the institution. Most of them are not empowered to interpret that, especially in public. If the speaker said something wrong, or misinterpreted something, it would be all over the net. This tends to lead to less communication, and clearly less valuable communication. This why I oppose opening all public servant communications to rebroadcast. ---- Now notifying a day ahead is bad manners, but not malignant. If Phil did it on purpose, I take that back. I expect that he either got the word then, or got busy until then. Either way an apology was due. ---- As for the comment from Toby "stood at the back of the room and noted who asked questions and what they asked about." and the response "I think your inferences that they are taking down your name to perform "follow up" investigations is outrageous." Read history. Conveniently you do not have to go back very far. Some might say Nixon or McCarthy. They will say that will never happen again. Ignoring the fact that "those people" are currently in charge of much if the current administration. I say look closer to home: http://www.refuseandresist.org/police_state/art.php?aid=572 The files reveal that, in addition to monitoring groups engaged in criminal actions, the police kept watch over a broad range of harmless political and civic organizations. Intelligence officers built files on the People’s Food Store co-op, the Northwest Oregon Voter Registration Project and the Women’s Rights Coalition — even the Bicycle Repair Collective, a city program offering a $24 course on how to fix flat tires and adjust brakes. -- Well there I attacked both the left, and the right in one post. Now onto work! > > RSVP Oregon Infragard wrote: > > I have presented your request to the board of directors and the presenters. They have requested that the presentation not be video taped. If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to give me a call. > > > > Phil R. Slinkard > > Special Agent > > Cyber Division > > FBI – Portland Division > > > > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > > From: Shaun Savage <savages@private> > > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:28:09 -0800 > > > > > >>Shaun Savage, I would like to video tape the event using TVTV > >>equipment. Then I could air it on public TV channel 11,23,... > >> > >> > > > > > > -- Zot O'Connor http://www.ZotConsulting.com http://www.WhiteKnightHackers.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Dec 22 2003 - 12:47:33 PST