Are we proving physical medium integrity or content validity? Content can be on paper, punchcard, magnetic tape and some rare instances even in molecular memory units. Regards, -Bojan |--------+-----------------------> | | "Jeff | | | Truedson" | | | <jtruedson@hu| | | bbell.com> | | | | | | 05/06/2002 | | | 11:52 AM | | | | |--------+-----------------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: FORENSICSat_private | | cc: (bcc: Bojan Zdravkovic/SIAC) | | Subject: RE: Preserving evidence | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------| ********************* "When copying a disk to another disk, a checksum of the destination disk will nearly always result in a different value than a checksum of the original disk, even when using the -IR switch. This difference is due to differences in disk geometry between the source and destination disks." ******************** The information above came from Symantec's knowledge base. Has anyone found this to be a problem in Court? TIA Jeff ----------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri May 10 2002 - 10:22:34 PDT