> When I did it last year it was to look at a employee > and not let them know we were looking at them. I'm still not clear on the need for "live" imaging. There wasn't enough information in your post about why you'd need to do this...when I was at Winstar, we had several incidents in which an employee needed to be "looked" at, but if someone (particularly a manager or admin) felt that they wanted it done w/o the employee knowing, we usually found out that (a) HR hadn't been notified, and (b) the person asking usually had an ulterior motive. If I may ask...in the case you mentioned, what was it that you had to find that required (a) a "live" image, and (b) the employee not knowing? Maybe that info, if it can be provided, will clear things up in my mind... Thanks, Carv __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 18 2002 - 17:58:44 PDT