The Lan Times review of SNG was flawed: at the time, IBM provided an official response giving details of the problems with the review. In a nutshell, the two main issues were: a) The review was of SNG 2.1, but 2.2 was released a month later; b) It was evident that the reviewers lacked knowledge on firewalls, for example stating that SNG ".. has no circuit level functionality..", but two sentences later talking about SNG's use of SOCKS, which I'm sure you know provides circuit-level functionality. I could give more examples, but I don't really want to rake over the dying embers of that review. I'll refer you to the home page http://www.software.ibm.com/enetwork/firewall/ for details of the latest IBM FIrewall V3.2 for AIX and NT. I can't pretend to be unbiassed, but I think you will find the IBM Firewall is very competitive in features and price with the other firewalls on the market. Andrew_Yeomansat_private, Installation Support Centre, EMEA Network Computing Software and e-business Centre of Competence, MP 3GS, IBM UK Ltd, 1 New Square, Bedfont Lakes, Feltham, Middlesex,TW14 8HB Tel: +44-181-818-4288 Int: 36-4288 Fax: +44-181-818-5475 Pager: 01523-494985 "It's a UNIX system. I _know_ this!" - Jurassic Park owner-firewall-wizardsat_private on 06-04-98 03:13:49 AM Please respond to fruggieriat_private To: firewall-wizardsat_private cc: Subject: IBM Marcus, I don't remember any thread on IBM Firewall (formerly SNG). True: I subscribed to this list only recently. Since I happen to work *with* (not *for*) an IBM group company, at times I have to knucle under their pressure. I expect sooner or later being involved in a discussion about IBM FW. I'd appreciate any observation on this product. I remember reading a very negative report on SNG 2.2 a couple of years ago (it was on LAN Times), but nothing more. Thank you for your help. ----------------------------------------- Franco RUGGIERI e-mail: fruggieriat_private
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 12:54:05 PDT