Re: IP 1.2.3.4

From: Hugo van der Kooij (hvdkooijat_private)
Date: Tue May 01 2001 - 11:15:52 PDT

  • Next message: Alfred Huger: "Administrivia - Thanks"

    On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Joshua Fritsch wrote:
    
    > I got hit on the 27th around 2AM.
    >
    > However, about an hour prior to that I got a back orifice "info" query from
    > a RoadRunner (rr.com) address, which leads me to believe they forgot to mask
    > themselves on the first run.  Logs follow.
    
    There are several differences.
    
    > [**] IDS399 - BackOrifice1-info [**]
    > 04/27-00:43:39.769935 24.92.246.190:3875 -> X.X.X.X:31337
    > UDP TTL:15 TOS:0x0 ID:8763 IpLen:20 DgmLen:46
    > Len: 26
    >
    > [**] IDS188/trojan-probe-back-orifice [**]
    > 04/27-01:58:57.786281 1.2.3.4:1024 -> X.X.X.X:31337
    > UDP TTL:110 TOS:0x0 ID:30544 IpLen:20 DgmLen:79
    > Len: 59
    >
    (two duplicate blocks removed)
    >
    > [**] IDS188/trojan-probe-back-orifice [**]
    > 04/27-02:21:41.751641 1.2.3.4:1024 -> X.X.X.X:31337
    > UDP TTL:110 TOS:0x0 ID:3482 IpLen:20 DgmLen:79
    > Len: 59
    
    The first entry is smaller and exibits some other differences as well.
    
    I got 5 hits recorded by snort that all are similar to your first entry
    but originating from 5 differen addresses.
    
    While I can't say they may not be the cause it is impossible to say they
    are.
    
    Hugo.
    
    PS: It would be nice if all ISP's and backbones would block spoofed IP
    addresses.
    
    --
    All email send to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage.
        hvdkooijat_private		http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
    	    Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins,
    	    for they are subtle and quick to anger.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 01 2001 - 17:55:20 PDT