On 29/12/01 22:04 -0700, Ryan Russell wrote: <snip> > normal people to keep up on patches is. I'm starting to think more and > more that a 3-month expiration date on Windows is a good idea. If you > haven't patched in 3 months, then your machine will refuse to do anything > but download patches... I second that idea. I don't think it will be implemented however, unless the installer allows for that. Then again, I don't like my machines updating themselves without my permission. (Yeah, I'm the geek that knows what I'm doing and keeps stuff patched on my servers. Thankfully I'm not the LAN admin, but I usually get to fix infected machines before the LAN admins can get to figure out that they are infected by a worm that yesterdays antivirus patch won't fix). Devdas Bhagat ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jan 02 2002 - 08:26:54 PST