att13543 writes: > I'd be interested if anyone can correlate what I've seen: we have 2 MX > records, one weighted at 10 (primary) and one at 20 (secondary). Of the > 200 or so MiMail's we've seen 100% have come through our SECONDARY mail > server. Maybe the SMTP engine was written poorly, or maybe it was this > way on purpose? We're running 4 MXs, and so far every MiMail we've seen has come to our highest-weight MX. [ The moderator asked me to clarify what "highest-weight" meant. It means highest weight in the same sense that the original posting used "weight" - the MX with lowest weight is the primary MX. ] -- Dick St.Peters, stpetersat_private Gatekeeper, NetHeaven, Saratoga Springs, NY Saratoga/Albany/Amsterdam/GlensFalls/Greenwich/NorthCreek/SaranacLake Oldest Internet service based in the Adirondack-Albany region --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 12:09:07 PDT