RE: DCOM95 for Windows 95

From: Schmehl, Paul L (paulsat_private)
Date: Fri Aug 08 2003 - 12:12:08 PDT

Next message: Brian Eckman: "Re: DCOM95 for Windows 95"

Previous message: Wcc: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Secure.dcom.exe"
Maybe in reply to: Eric Appelboom: "DCOM95 for Windows 95"
Next in thread: V Khosla: "Re: DCOM95 for Windows 95"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thank you Marc, and eEye, for an invaluable service to the community.
Maybe some day we'll have the money to actually buy your real product.
:-)

Paul Schmehl (paulsat_private)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Maiffret [mailto:marcat_private] 
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:45 AM
> To: Eric Appelboom; incidentsat_private
> Subject: RE: DCOM95 for Windows 95
> 
> 
> The bugs with the scanner detecting 95/98 as vulnerable have 
> been fixed in version 1.0.4 of the free scanner.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next message: Brian Eckman: "Re: DCOM95 for Windows 95"
Previous message: Wcc: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Secure.dcom.exe"
Maybe in reply to: Eric Appelboom: "DCOM95 for Windows 95"
Next in thread: V Khosla: "Re: DCOM95 for Windows 95"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 08 2003 - 14:36:06 PDT