Marc Maiffret wrote: > The bugs with the scanner detecting 95/98 as vulnerable have been fixed in > version 1.0.4 of the free scanner. > > Signed, > Marc Maiffret <snip> Marc, et. al., Are you sure DCOM for Windows 95/98 is not vulnerable? NT4 came out before this product, 2000/XP after it, and they all are vulnerable. I guess I am struggling with the idea of assuming that they got it right with these products... I've been meaning to mess around with DCOM for Windows 98, but haven't gotten there yet. Does anybody have any insight into whether or not they are vulnerable or not that they wish to share? Brian -- Brian Eckman Security Analyst OIT Security and Assurance University of Minnesota 612-626-7737 "There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those who don't." --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 08 2003 - 14:36:28 PDT