* David Wagner <dawat_private> [010412 19:26]: > Seth Arnold wrote: > > [existing processes, load and unload questions] > > I would propose to let this be module specific. > [...] > Is there any reason this is not sufficient? Well, while it is the easiest solution, and quite probably the best approach, I think the interactions between several security modules should take place in one of several well-defined methods. Would it be at all useful to define possible interactions between the modules and allow loading the modules iff there are no conflicts in their handling of load/unload per-process setups? Or should this sort of conflict be left entirely to the documentation and users? -- Earthlink: The #1 provider of unsolicited bulk email to the Internet.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:15:29 PDT