David Wagner wrote: > > Andrew Morgan wrote: > >I don't mean configure my module. I mean, things like: aud_get_id(); or > >inf_set_file(); etc., which in a kernel patch would be system calls. > > Again, why do those need to be system calls? Seems like they can > all be handled with an entry in the /proc filesystem (or another fs). > It sounds like I must not understand the problem. getpid() is a system call. Are you arguing that getpid() could equally well be implemented in the /proc/ filesystem? chmod() is a system call, are you saying that it could equally well be implemented in the /proc/ filesystem? >From where I stand these functions are all essentially equivalent and thus all seem like system calls to me. Is this that what you are saying too, but concluding that all new functions should be implemented via the /proc/ interface? Thanks Andrew _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 17:25:37 PDT